Guidelines for Letter Writers
The page provides information and guidelines for both support writers and composite writers to help them with the writing process. If you have any questions or concerns about writing a Letter of Recommendation or Composite Letter, please feel free to reach out to HPP at Health.Professions.Program@dartmouth.edu.
Guidelines for Support Writers
As part of the process of applying to medical or dental school, Dartmouth applicants typically request 3 – 5 “support writers” to write them letters of recommendation, plus a “head writer” (composite writer) who will write a summative letter called the Dartmouth Composite Letter of Evaluation. As a support writer, you are one of a handful of writers speaking on behalf of the applicant, and you get to focus on your own direct experience with the applicant.
Medical and dental schools are interested in learning about the applicant’s competencies, skills and abilities, and personal qualities. The applicant chose you to be a support writer for them because they value your perspective and history with them, whether that be in the context of the classroom, research and scholarship, athletics, service and volunteering, clinical exposure, professional work, etc.
These guidelines and tips are meant to help you with writing your letter of recommendation, including going over the process, requirements, and considerations to think about when writing. Along with these guidelines, the Association of American Medical Schools (AAMC) Letter Guidelines is also an excellent resource that describes a variety of professional, intellectual, and scientific competencies. Medical and dental schools do not expect applicants to have all the competencies listed, so do not feel obligated to address all of them. By going beyond just listing competencies by providing specific examples, you can make your letter more compelling and illustrate the applicant’s strengths more vividly.
If you have any questions or concerns about writing a letter of recommendation, please do not hesitate to reach out to our office at Health.Professions.Program@dartmouth.edu.
Letters of recommendation are required to have the following:
- Letterhead: This can be an official letterhead from the writer’s employer or a self-created one. If the writer creates their own letterhead, it should contain their name, contact information, the name of their employer, and their title/position.
- Signature: This can be an electronic signature (ex., Adobe Reader with signature capability), a JPG/PNG of your signature copied/pasted to a Word document, or a handwritten then scanned signature.
- Date: Should be at the top of the letter after the writer’s letterhead.
- Correct Name and Spelling: Writers – especially those who may be writing multiple letters – should make sure they include the correct name and spelling of the applicant they are writing for.
- It’s okay to use the applicant’s nickname if that is what they commonly go by. Ex. using “Nick” or “Ali” instead of “Nicholas” or “Alison.”
- It’s okay to use Ms./Mrs./Miss or Mr. to refer to the applicant if you prefer to be more formal.
- Salutations: Make sure to start your letter with typical salutations such as “To Whom It May Concern” or “Dear Admissions Committee.”
Yes! The letter of recommendation is confidential. The applicant waives their right to view their letters of recommendation. Do not share your letter with the applicant!
Additional note about sharing an applicant’s personal information: If you know personal information (i.e., challenges due to background, personal or family health issues, mental health, financial status, etc.) about the applicant that you believe is relevant to your evaluation and gives valuable context to their application, please make sure to get the applicant’s permission before sharing!
Who will see my letter?
Please note that each of the following entities will have access to your letter on a need-to-know basis; however, they will keep your letter confidential from the applicant.
- The Applicant’s Composite Writer: The composite writer is the applicant’s “head writer,” who is charged with writing a summative letter called the Dartmouth Composite Letter of Evaluation. They will read your letter and incorporate information and quotes from your letter into their evaluation of the applicant. Please note that your letter will still be included in the final letter packet that is sent to medical or dental schools.
- Health Professions Program Staff: HPP reviews and edits composite letters (not letters of recommendation) to ensure quality and integrity. This may involve reading your letter to make sure essential information was not left out of the composite letter. HPP also creates the final Dartmouth Composite Letter of Evaluation Packet, which contains a cover letter from HPP describing unique aspects of Dartmouth, the composite letter, and the applicant’s letters of recommendation.
- Medical or Dental Schools: Including admissions staff, admissions committee members, and interviewers.
- Administrative Staff from Application Services: For medical schools, the common application services are AMCAS (MD schools), AACOMAS (Osteopathic schools), and TMDSAS (for Texas medical schools). For dental schools, the common application services are AADSAS and TMDSAS (for Texas dental schools).
We advise applicant’s to establish deadlines with you. Our ideal target date for submitting support letters is March 25th. If this can't be met, our final suggested deadline is May 30th. A deadline within this suggested timeframe is ideal. Deadlines are crucial because students need their support letters before their composite writer can begin to write. The composite writer requires sufficient time to draft the letter, submit it to HPP, address any feedback, and resubmit. Afterwards, our office compiles a composite packet to upload to the student’s application. There are many steps in this process, and any delays could impact the applicant’s application timeline. Since medical schools have rolling admissions, the timing of their application is a critical factor.
We use a service called PrivateFolio to collect letters of recommendation. Applicants are responsible for creating a PrivateFolio account and submitting a PrivateFolio Letter of Recommendation Request addressed to each of their writers. When an applicant submits a letter request, it will prompt PrivateFolio to send you an upload link to submit your letter.
Please note: It’s not unusual for the upload link to end up in writers’ spam or junk folders. If you cannot find the upload link in your inbox, check there first. If you’re still unable to find the upload link, reach out directly to PrivateFolio for assistance. Oftentimes, PrivateFolio is able to upload the letter on the writer’s behalf. PrivateFolio can be reached at (855) 976-1245 or help@privatefolio.com.
We highly recommend keeping the letter to 1 – 2 pages. At most, do not write more than 3 pages. Medical and dental schools read hundreds of letters each year, so being concise and “straight to the point” is valuable.
Tips for Keeping the Letter Concise
Based on feedback we’ve received from medical schools, we recommend avoiding details about the structure of your course or your research, unless it’s necessary context for the reader to understand the applicant’s performance or qualities, strengths, competencies, etc. that they demonstrated. Even then details should be kept brief. Beyond stating your position and possibly how long you’ve been in your role, medical and dental schools don’t need to know anything about your background.
When reflecting on your experiences with and direct observations of the applicant, provide specific examples and consider the following:
- Qualities in the classroom, rather than grades. Medical and dental schools can see the applicant’s performance metrics (i.e., grades, GPA, MCAT or DAT scores). What they don’t know is the context, such as how the applicant acted in the classroom, lab, or office hours, or if you were delighted to have them in class. There’s also no need to rehash class standing or grades, unless there is important context about it.
- Speaking to the applicant’s intellectual engagement is highly valuable. It is also great to talk about how the applicant led a lab team or navigated a tricky group conflict or consistently had unusually perceptive or creative comments or was particularly good at incorporating feedback, etc.
- Including statistical comparisons, can be helpful (but not necessary), as they show clearly how the applicant’s performance stands out among their peers. For example: “Based on my 10 years of teaching, I would place Maria in the top 2% of students I have taught.” If you decide to include a statistical comparison, make sure to back that comparison up with specific examples.
- Context for a grade can be helpful. For example: His final grade does not reflect his success. He actually failed his first exam but then he put in every effort into fully engaging with the class and material—office hours with me, tutoring, shifting study strategies and as he gained confidence he asked increasingly meaningful questions with genuine curiosity. These are the qualities I would value in my physician)
- Personal qualities based on your observations. Write about if they’re notably patient, empathetic, extra-prepared, go above and beyond, etc. You can also include information from Teaching Assistants, Graduate Research Assistants, or others who worked closely with the applicant. You can also include information from evaluation forms. It’s OK to co-write with a grad student or TA. You can also include snippets of feedback, if the applicant received peer feedback or worked as a TA themself.
- Please note: We do not recommend asking the applicant to draft their own letter, as this would undermine the integrity of the process. Instead, you could ask the applicant to provide you with an autobiographical sketch, request that they draft bullet points on what they would like you to focus on, a list of roles and responsibilities they had in your lab/job, or on their achievements directly observed by you, etc. It can also be helpful to set up a meeting with them to talk through ideas!
- Talk about the applicant’s growth! Applicants who learn how to learn/study in a new way, how to take feedback, or how to move beyond setbacks, are great for medical and dental schools to know about, and much more telling than someone who sailed right through the class.
- Share personal information about the applicant that helps medical and dental schools contextualize their performance. Again, please make sure it’s okay with the applicant if you are sharing their personal information that might otherwise be considered confidential such information about their physical or mental health, or a Title IX experience. An applicant who communicated professionally about challenging circumstances and still won your endorsement could be the rising star they’re looking for. Similarly, your personal reaction to the applicant can be helpful. For example, “I’d be delighted to have them in my lab as a graduate applicant” or “I would eagerly send my family members to her as a physician” is meaningful.
- Discuss the applicant’s experiences if you have direct knowledge. For instance, you were the applicant’s supervisor, coach, PI, etc., and got to see the applicant in action, and therefore, can speak directly to their experience. By discussing the applicant’s experiences (ex., research and other scholarly pursuits, volunteer or service work, Greek life, athletics, professional or clinical experiences, etc.), you can provide a comprehensive view of the applicant beyond just their grades and test scores. You can discuss how these experiences have shaped the applicant and their journey, the skills and abilities they developed, or demonstrate how they interact with others in various settings. If you have not seen the applicant in these experiences directly, it is not as helpful to provide an overview of their resume, as medical schools will already have access to this.
- Reflect on the applicant’s motivations. Medical and dental schools want to know the applicant’s motivations for pursuing a career in healthcare. As a writer, you can give insight into how the applicant’s motivations are reflected in their academic journey; in their extracurricular or professional pursuits; and how they worked to develop the personal qualities necessary to be a good healthcare professional, such as compassion and empathy, interpersonal skills, communication skills, leadership, and advocacy, etc.
Focus on the applicant, not the research itself! Most medical school admissions professionals will not have the background to understand detailed or technical descriptions of research, and moreover, they are not particularly concerned about the actual research. Instead, they want to know about the applicant and their performance in participating in or conducting research. What were their roles and responsibilities? How did they learn or grow? How did they interact with others on the research team? If the applicant interacted with patients, what were those interactions like? What skills or abilities did they demonstrate? While some description of the research may be necessary to provide context for the applicant’s performance, these descriptions are most valuable if they are brief and written in layman’s terms.
Consider using bold text strategically. While not required, strategically bolding sentences, phrases, or words can be a useful method for highlighting important aspects or points about an applicant to medical or dental schools. Just make sure not to overuse bolding so as not to diminish its impact.
Set up a meeting with the applicant. It may be helpful to arrange a meeting with the applicant (they may even request one with you!) to discuss their goals, ideas for content, expectations, and to agree on a deadline that works for both of you! Also, applicants will likely provide you with supportive materials, such as an autobiographical sketch and their transcript, but if you need more, do not hesitate to ask them.
Be honest with the student. If you do not feel you know the applicant well enough, or if you have had a negative experience with them, it is okay to say no. While this can be difficult, it is truly an act of kindness, as it allows the student to find someone else. Only say yes if you can write a supportive letter of recommendation.
Consistent Communication is KEY! Make sure to update the applicant if your personal timeline for writing the letter of recommendation has changed. We also recommend letting the applicant know whether there is a preferred way for them to contact you and/or whether you will be unavailable for any specific period of time! This can help the applicant immensely during what is often a high-stress time for them!
Guidelines for Composite Writers
The composite letter is a unique, comprehensive letter written by a “composite writer” that provides an in-depth perspective on an applicant’s preparedness for medical/dental school. IT is Dartmouth’s version of a “committee letter.” The composite writer integrates their own observations about the applicant with information from the applicant’s support letters and other support materials (such as the applicant’s autobiographical sketch, resume, and transcript). When completed, the composite will be a holistic summation of the applicant’s academic, professional, and extracurricular experiences, as well as their personal qualities and character.
Medical and dental schools value committee letters because they provide a unique institutional and integrated perspective on the applicant’s preparedness for medical/dental school. Committee letters provide a comprehensive evaluation on the applicant based on direct observation and the synthesis of information from faculty/others within and/or outside an institution.
The composite writer's role is to provide a holistic, summative evaluation of the applicant and their preparedness for medical or dental school based on their own knowledge and experiences of the applicant, while also incorporating quotes and information from the applicant's letters of recommendation to support their evaluation.
Composite writers should consider, based on their observations, the applicants academic and intellectual skills, professional and extracurricular experiences, and personal qualities that make them a suitable candidate for medical or dental school. If the applicant has experienced any personal hardships that have impacted their journey to medical school, it may be necessary to address that in the composite letter as well with the applicant's permission. You may not be able to reflect on all these areas - and that is okay! Where your knowledge lacks, you can use quotes and information from the applicant's letters of recommendation and other documents to fill in the gaps.
There is no strict deadline. Applicants are expected to speak with their composite writers and agree on a deadline to submit the composite letter. Therefore, each composite writer will have a different deadline.
With that said, HPP recommends the below target deadlines for applicants and composite writers. However, there is flexibility, and if composite writers need a later deadline that is okay!
March 25
- The applicant notifies HPP that all their letters of recommendation and other supporting materials are submitted.
- HPP releases the applicant's letters and materials to the composite writer.
- The composite writer is then given at least 4 - 6 weeks to write.
Mid-May - June 25
- The composite writer submits their composite letter to HPP for review.
Mid-May - August
- HPP reviews and finalizes the composite letter.
- The review process can take 1 - 4 weeks depending on various factors (such as the date of submission, the number of other composites on our list to review, the edits needed, how quickly the composite writer can respond to feedback, etc.).
One of the strengths of the composite letter is that it is unique to each composite writer. There is no strict requirements in terms of content, format, or structure. However, the following elements are required.
Letterhead: If you do not have a letterhead or using one would be inappropriate, please include a heading with your contact information, employer information, and your title/position.
Signature and date: Signature can be added using:
- Adobe Reader with signature capability
- JPG/PNG of signature added to a Word document
- Signed by hand, scanned, and dated
Confidentiality: The applicant waives their right to view both the composite letter and their letters of recommendation. Do not share your composite letter with the applicant!
Personal Information: If you know personal information about the applicant that you believe is relevant to your evaluation, make sure to get the applicant’s permission before sharing!
Again, while there are no strict requirements for format or structure, we do recommend keeping the following in mind:
It is most typical for composite letters to be between 3 - 4 pages. We wouldn't recommend writing more than 5 pages.
Headers can be a helpful way to organize your composite letter.
If there are any points about the applicant you want to emphasize, consider bolding them!
HPP will send the following materials to the composite writer:
- All the applicant’s letters of recommendation.
- The applicant’s autobiographical sketch (sometimes the applicant may also decide to include their personal statement and list of activities).
- The applicant’s resume.
- The applicant’s transcript.
- The applicant’s AAMC ID number.
NOTE: Consider a meeting with the applicant, whether in-person or virtual, to discuss their goals and aspirations, or to flesh out some of the pieces one might find in any of the above. Applicant’s will love to speak with you.
Yes, we do! For confidentiality reasons, we cannot share these publicly. If you are a composite writer and would like to review our sample composite letters, please feel free to reach out to us at Health.Professions.Program@dartmouth.edu.
Introduce the writing “committee,” including yourself, and the applicant.
- Ex. I am pleased to write this enthusiastic composite letter of evaluation on behalf of myself, Dartmouth faculty and staff, and other letter writers, for [applicant’s full name], Dartmouth Class of [class year], in support of [his/her/their] application to medical/dental school].
- Ex. On behalf of myself, several Dartmouth colleagues, and other professionals, I am pleased to write this most enthusiastic composite letter of evaluation for [applicant’s full name], Dartmouth Class of [class year], in support of [his/her/their] application to medical/dental school.
Introduce the background of the composite writer and their relationship with the applicant. NOTE: the focus of the composite letter should be on the applicant. ONLY include enough information about your background/work to provide context. Ideally, keep this information brief.
- Ex. Having taught [applicant’s first name] in two undergraduate biology courses, working closely with her as my research assistant, and after many hours discussing her aspiration and life experiences, I feel I am in an excellent position to summarize her many attributes that support her application to medical/dental school.
- Ex. I have known [applicant’s first name] since the end of their sophomore year when I asked them to be one of my teaching assistants because of their strong performance in my course and strong interpersonal skills. I look forward to providing you with a lens to confirm their preparation for medical school.
Medical/dental schools look for language that can help them identify the strength of the applicant. Assessment statements are something that schools look closely at. You can, of course, provide a personal assessment statement, but in your introduction and conclusion, you should also include a collective “WE” assessment statement.
- Ex. Collectively, we believe that [applicant’s first name] is a superb candidate, one of the best from [applicant’s class year], and one richly deserving of admission to medical/dental school.
- Ex. We give our highest possible recommendation to [applicant’s first name] application to medical/dental school.
- Ex. Together, we profusely believe that [applicant’s first name] will be an outstanding medical/dental student and future physician/dentist.
Some schools have 1-2 writers writing all the letters; therefore, they have a point of comparison. Sometimes the writer only has information about the applicant from one letter of recommendation and an interview.
Dartmouth has a more personalized approach. A composite writer may only be writing for 1-2 applicants; and therefore, can’t compare in that way.
When is comparison useful?
- When specific to YOUR experiences.
- Ex. I have worked with undergraduates and graduate students, as well as research assistants, for over 15 years and can easily say that [applicant’s first name] ranks as one of the top three assistant I have ever had.
- Ex. In class of 85 students, many of whom were highly motivated and talented pre-health students, [applicant’s first name] was easily in the top 5% in terms of academic performance and engagement.
Other schools use consistent, uniform language to describe applicants. Examples include:
- Outstanding Candidate
- Excellent Candidate
- Very Strong Candidate
- Strong Candidate
- Good Candidate
- Enthusiastically Highest Recommendation
- Highest Recommendation.
- Recommended Very Highly
- Recommended Highly
- Recommended
- Recommended with Reservations
Dartmouth does not have a similar language – this allows our composite letters to be more personalized. However, medical/dental do look for this language, so if you are a more stoic writer by nature, do consider using more impactful adjectives/language to describe the applicant.
While you will integrate your evaluation of the applicant with information/quotes from their letters of recommendation, it may be necessary to provide broader context concerning their time at Dartmouth.
Composite Writers are always affiliated with Dartmouth; therefore, you can provide unique context for following:
- Dartmouth specific quirks and programming.
- Any special accomplishments the applicant has achieved.
- Life challenges that may have impacted the applicant’s academic performance.
- Put into perspective the applicant’s success relative to the obstacles they may have had to overcome.
- Highlight the applicant’s unique gifts/talents.
- Any institutional actions the applicant may have received.
- You MUST use direct quotes from each of the applicant’s letters of recommendation.
- Use direct quotes to support both your own observations and to share/demonstrate the applicant’s competencies, abilities, and attributes that you may not have been aware of. Along with your own knowledge of the applicant, their letters of recommendation are your best primary sources.
- NOTE: Letters are meant to be confidential. If you have concerns about at letter, please let HPP know (not the student or the writer).